@christinebarbeau3191

I just found your channel. Thank you brother. Please do not be discouraged. Your video delivers a message that is clearly unpopular by the lazy, sleepy , churchianity. Its actually,  helping me see that what we've been taught is not only a pack of lies in a worldly sense, but also the churches themselves.  I had a dream about people being paid to confuse the brethren.  I did not recognize them. So, I started watching all the various positions and theories. I do pray always for discernment,  testing the spirits with WORD. Yahshua bless you and family. Shabbat Shalom

@inspiredasmr1031

Oh there it is. You put 1844 on the screen. That answers my question.

@Mike_at_Voxmirage

Great job on this!   Do you mind if I ask where you found your GIF images?  I'd love to use some of them for my bible study.   God Bless!
~mike

@berean65

The pre-trib rapture has to happen first before the tribulation, also known as the time of Jacob's trouble.

@sandramtrayes

Fulfilled means fulfilled not some has and some still to happen .

@tomnoyb8301

Order of events?:  There's really only one clearly identifiable point on the timeline; when AC confirms treaty, thus initiating great-tribulation.  Yes there are astral-events, but none so clear as tribulation-kickoff (that singular-event having been prophecied so universally in Matt24, Daniel9, 2Thess2, etc.).  Question regards Revelation's order-of-events?  Is it your belief that Revelation occurs in chronological order?  Is mystery-Babylon really only destroyed after most of the world's population is already dead?  After cups and bowls and seals?  Well after great-tribulation's begun?  It simply seems like Revelation is not written in chronological-order?

@inspiredasmr1031

I like that you are analyzing Revelation from a dual sanctuary and chronological perspective. I enjoy watching, however I disagree. Is this your own personal interpretation? It feels like you are attempting to teach some specific church doctrine or traditional theory you’ve been taught. I’m not feeling your personal thoughts and ideas being put forth. It sounds like you are explaining by rote.  I’ve seen this sort of proof text hermeneutical style from my youth. First of all you say chapter 4 is God Almighty, the Father in the throne room, and Jesus is not there. And then, in chapter 5 Jesus appears, which means that he must have just ascended. So you’re saying that chapter 4 and five are in chronological order, “a progression in history”, but then you skip back to chapter 1 and say it happens afterward? The chronological theory crumbles. You describe the lampstand as being the the seven spirits, and then you change it to being the seven churches. It cannot be both, can it? Also, you believe that the show bread is Jesus and the father. I see absolutely no connection between the two. First of all, there are six stacks or loaves of bread on each side. How does the father and Jesus represent six stacks of bread? Your explanation is that the bread represents the word of God, and the word of God is Jesus. But then your explanation stops there. That doesn’t really explain why the father is the other stack of bread. The father is never described as the word of God, or the bread. That only applies to Jesus, right? So how do you differentiate? How are you saying now that the father also is represented by the bread, and the father is also the Word? The bread is “My body”. It’s His human body. Going back a little when you were reading about the father on the throne and the lamb in the midst of the throne you brushed over the description of he who sat on the throne, the rainbow and the sardius stone. What do those represent? You say that Jesus, standing before the seven lampstands represents him, making sure that the light of the churches is never extinguished. Where do you get this idea? There’s nothing there to indicate that he is standing among them to be sure that they are never extinguished. That is an interpretation with no foundation as far as I can see. Where do you find an explanation to support that theory?

@springflowerblosomnorris9721

Now that you presented Revelation from people's point of view, with all the added corruptions to the scriptures, you can throw it away and for a change believe the scriptures from God"s point of view, WITHOUT adding to the scriptures. 

If you add to the scriptures you will suffer the consequences written in Revelation 22:18
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

If you decide to REST in Jesus Christ than you should know that he accomplished a perfect obedience according to the scriptures. This perfection is imputed to you and then you can clearly see to read and understand the scriptures. 

Why don't you want to learn how to KEEP the perfection of Jesus Christ?

Maybe you should believe the bible instead of believe other sources and other people. 

All glory to Lord God Almighty and Jesus Christ my savior, blessed be his NAME forever and ever. 
Numbers 6:24-27
Revelation 22:4-5

@alongcamejones309

Oh no it's SDA Eschatology with it's mythical 1844 🤔😆