@TheKonecny
Michael Sandel recognizes that listeners can't make good decisions. Michael Sandel tries to give the listeners hints. However, the audience does not understand the question.
@thescandinavian8339
The notion that the average garage worker or asphalt layer is providing as much benefit to society as any professor is something academics find hard to wrap their head around.
@DoFliesCallUsWalks
Prof.Sandel is pure legend.
@robdavies4294
Educated these days means educated in a narrow technical domain. You can easily come out a technical adult but a philosophical and moral infant. In the past being educated meant educated in a more classical way, including the liberal arts, that included moral and political philosophy. One comes out with programming skills and strong convictions around their first thoughts, the other comes out knowing how to think, what they think, why they think it, and the pros and cons of many alternatives. Unlike Mill's era, education no longer correlates with being a well rounded, rational, morally sophisticated person capable of critical thought to make better decisions than average.
@franciscogalan8017
Audience is terrible. They can't straight-forwardly answer Prof. Sandel's questions. Some others are just starring at their phones.
@CZ-PC
Such a good talk.
@CZ-PC
Forgot to mention that politicians self select for university degrees by simply having vastly more income than the average person.
@chickenfishhybrid44
I love it when people do things like that. In a time when there was little to no Democracy in the world of any kind, have to make sure and point out that not every single person would have been able to vote.
@NikolaosEnmetanoia
The audience just could not accept the fact that they were actually (in reality) supporting what John S. Mill suggested, because they want to appear politically correct. But, let's face it, educated people are better at analysing problems and strategising solutions. So, it is inevitable having more of them in governments and parliaments. And, we all would agree (I suppose), it is for the better of our societies.
@morganmayfair4755
Bearded lawmakers make bearded laws. What if all the choices you are given are authoritarian? What if all, or the majority of your representatives have fallen under the threat of blackmail? What we should try is a direct democracy ❤️
@isatousarr7044
"Democracy's Discontent" reflects a growing sense of dissatisfaction with democratic systems, particularly as they grapple with deepening social, economic, and political divides. At its core, this discontent arises from the gap between democratic ideals and the realities of modern governance, where inequalities persist, political polarization intensifies, and citizens often feel alienated from the political process. While democracy promises equality, participation, and freedom, the growing influence of special interest groups, corporate power, and media manipulation can undermine these principles, leaving many to question whether democracy truly serves the public good. This discontent is also fueled by a perceived erosion of trust in democratic institutions and leaders, compounded by widespread cynicism about the effectiveness of democratic processes in addressing pressing global challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and systemic racism. Many feel that while democracy promises empowerment, it often results in gridlock, inefficiency, and a lack of meaningful change. As a result, the dissatisfaction with democracy isn't just about political outcomes, but about the very mechanisms through which political power is exercised, leading to calls for reform or even questioning of democratic legitimacy itself. However, despite these frustrations, democracy remains a powerful framework for addressing injustice and advancing collective well-being. The discontent with democracy can also serve as a catalyst for renewal and transformation, prompting a reimagining of democratic values and institutions that are more inclusive, responsive, and capable of meeting the complex challenges of our time. Ultimately, "Democracy's Discontent" calls for a critical reassessment of how democracy functions in practice and how it can be strengthened to better reflect the needs and aspirations of all citizens.
@JimNaser
Well, the question of democracy isn’t actually about making the correct decision obviously it will never be , it’s rather about making a decision with more people involved, regardless their education level , they just need to be living in a certain place
@anaajibicho
It’s just as much about feeling like you have a word in the system.
@FilipeBrasAlmeida
Welfare-to-work and other assorted requirements and conditionalities on receiving social assistance and public services, are all different ways of saying: "you are less worthy of support and less of a citizen than others".
@lilianteo3229
There was a lawyer whose voice was above the law. Many respected him for some good reasons & his son, not a lawyer, inherited his infamous characteristics that led Perils to Democracy for 20 decades. I disagree that the well-educated/professionals make better decisions.
@dabrack9350
It is insulting to assume work that pays less is less necessary or respectable. However, it is inescapable that the pay is determined by supply and demand. When more is needed or less is available, the pay increases unless arbitrary restraints such as government mandates or prohibitions exist.
@dabrack9350
The professor said more presentations would address solutions. How can I find them?
@waquerhossain1207
On John Stewart Mill’s proposition: I thought that was my idea ! Nevertheless the fundamental problem with the weighted voting will be reflected on the dispensation of law which shall also become skewed which would constitute as human rights violation, ergo undemocratic
@harriemeeuwis978
So the guy from Egypt was right, it was a trick question from the prof. He wanted the answer the second guy from Uganda gave so he could throw in Stuart Mills answer. Very week performance for a Google meet.
@judiththermidor5506