@QRLedger

As an organization that reviews a lot of (misleading/curious) content on this subject, it's refreshing for us to view content that's well researched and balanced.

For those interested in the subject of post-quantum crypography and blockhain, we've been working with the research team at Geometry Labs who are working with lattice-based signatures and have a live video + AMA with them in a few hours from this post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWqIgk2Vv5A

Our last video with geometry labs a few weeks ago can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0mByWsZArI

As a point of clarification about being NIST approved. Even though XMSS is widely considered as quantum secure, it's also a stateful signature scheme with implementation particularities which makes it not suitable for all environments. Because of that, early on, NIST evaluated and approved it on a separate track. You can see the recommendation here:  https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-208.pdf. For some trivia, XMSS was also recommended earlier by the PQCRYPTO group, though we now reference NIST as they're seemingly leading the charge on this front.

The last point is that updating blockchain isn't likely to be a smooth process. First, post-quantum crypto coming out of NIST at present isn't likely to be a drop-in replacement in these blockchain systems, then there needs to be consensus for upgrades, development, and a testnet period. Even with that out of the way, as many people are their own custodians, users will need to update their keys, which is like getting everyone in the world to update the locks on their doors individually. At best, this is slow, and at worst, isn't possible in all cases. This is all summarized with Mosca's Theorem, which is worth a read for those interested in the planning of a post-quantum upgrade, not just in the blockchain space, but outside of the blockchain space as well.

@wileydewitt

This is a great video, no filler or gimmicks. Just very quality crypto talk.

@edlim3287

Thanks for very informative video :) i actually saw your older videos from youtube's algo, so i just popped over to your channel profile to see the current videos, and i was somewhat surprise to see cryptocurrencies , but it was really informative and useful! I just wanted to add that you seem much more at ease in presentation (compare to your past vids) which is awesome :)

@ArjanvanVught

Bedankt

@urbnctrl

Hi! Now would be a very interesting time to publish a new update on this with the release of Willow!

@pvenkata1319

For a second before watching your previous videos,I thought I learnt everything and nothing at the same time, superknowledge

@V3VoVo

They said “beauty and brain don’t co-exist.”   They lied.  I enjoyed and learned from this vid.  Sub!!!

@MrJ120

What do you think about cellframe?

@bhapigoodnewschannel1726

Thanks so much, this is a great video. Keep up the great work and content.

@xt3708

Thank you so much for the great info. I'm new to crypto and was wondering about quantum potentially defeating crypto algos and your video answered lots of my questions. Do you think when current generation of crypto's become verifiably vulnerable at some point in the future that there could be some sort of bridge/conversion System built so coin holders can migrate to a qu resistant blockchain/crypto without losing anything? if that q makes sense

@swingingwinnie7796

Thank you Anastasia. Would it be correct to assume that privacy coins like Monero (which txs hide the public key) are quantum resistant?

@olivermusic5764

Thank you for this information!!  👍🏼😎

@jarcadipane2849

Curious to know, now, when is SHA-256 going to be updated / upgraded ?

@qvrticosmos5641

Part 2 pls. I'm hooked ✨

@tutacat

How do we know how big quantum chips there are now, or how far in development they are, or who will or does have access to them.
Not to mention store and decrypt attacks.

@배원찬-j6e

Thank you for the fun video!
If you don't mind, could you make a video about Tidecoin and Arielcoin?
Both coins are quantum coins, but I don't know from my knowledge.😂

@NicolinaDanielle

QRL is where it's at. It's gonna be LITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

@Ompanime

Hey Anastasia, have you ever come into possession of Andreas Hulsing's Review of Mochimo's WOTS implementation? If so, I would like to cite it directly for research cross-referencing proclaimed PQ blockchains.

@wolffeatherdancer

Great comparison. Can you cover QANplatform (QANX) next time?

@farnio

how do you buy Mochimo?