@davidr6540

Learned freshman calculus (1970-71 MIT) from Professor Mattuck. Possibly the best lecturer I have ever seen for math. Usually after a class you get it but then it fades away until you do the homework. People including me would just plain get it after his lectures and the understanding would stick. He made calculus easy.

@matthewsheeran

Yep. Turns a complex (pun intended) integral into simple algebra for his students. Now that's a teacher!

@ShahzMunir

My favorite professor at MIT.

@gmortimer20031

Fair enough, I inhabit the complex domain, being a worker with signals, and so that would more-or-less be my way of doing it, although I would probably use the (to us) well-known identity cos( x ) = cosh( ix ) = ( exp( ix ) + exp( - ix )) / 2 :-

I = integral( exp( -x ) cos( x ) dx )
substituting p = -x, we have
dp = -dx
exp(-x) = exp(p)
cos(x)  = cos(-x) = cos(p)
Using the easily memorable identity cos( x ) = cosh( ix )

I = - integral( exp( p ) cosh( ip ) dp )
( definition of cosh( x )) = -integral( exp(p)(( exp( ip ) + (exp(-ip))/2 )
( defactoring )                  = -1/2 x integral(exp((1+i)p) + exp((1-i)p )
( integrating )                    = -1/2 x (exp(1+i)p)/(1+i) + exp((1-i)p)/(1-i))
( adding fractions )          = -1/2 x exp(p) * ((1-i)exp(ip) + (1+i)exp(-ip)) / ((1+i)(1-i)) 
( expand and collect complex exponentials )  = -1/2 * exp( p ) x ( 2 cos(p) + 2 sin(p) ) / 2 )
 (resubstituting p = -x )    = exp(-x)/2 x ( sin( x ) - cos( x ) )

no messing around with normalization or only considering real parts ( a possible source of doubt to the inquiring young mind ) needed.

@mikevaldez7684

Brilliant!  Fantastic, straightforward exposition....beautiful.
The internet really is a game changer 4 learning

@nareshmehndiratta

this is my second time seeing a lecture of Prof Arthur Mattuk after ten years

@jimztar

This is an awesome video, but you did forget the ' + c '

@canned_heat1444

Man, do I miss this course. Pure gold

@UltraMaXAtAXX

"This is what separates the girls from the women."

@hamsterpoop

@Ghaiyst 
Wikipedia: Euler's formula

@shadowmagician21

This guy is amazing

@gustavozapana3583

es una forma interesante de resolver con números imaginario porque usualmente lo resolvemos integración por partes pero una interesante clase en el prestigioso MIT saludos desde UNTELS  LIMA PERU

@MrHamsi

thanks, that's definitely easier than integrating by parts!

@abaddon1112

if I had a chalkboard or dry erase board setup like that in my house, I'd have no use for video games.. only more chalk or dry erase markers lol

@quantummath

Damn it! it was just lovely.

@ryanchiang9587

diffetetial equations and partial differential equations are totally different!

@shawnwilliams77

Fascinating...

@Phatency

3:16 "Damn it.. this just always happens... well fuck it."

@noablackdog

@Ghaiyst  did you really had a loo k at Euler's formula which is exactly:

e^'ix) = cos(x ) + i  sin(x).

N.B. the method given in the video is nowhere near the simplest way to tackle with this indefinite integral;  sufices to write that a primitive function of  e^(-x) cos(x) is e(-x)( Acos(x) + Bsin(x)) and allyou need to do is equal derivates of both parts to get a simple linear system with A and B as unknown quantities...(takes less than 1 minute...)

@carsonb8952

integrating by parts seems way easier