@bassubforce1974
This might be the best example of “what is bro yappin about” that I’ve ever seen
@jacobcombs1106
The function described is (√n)^3/n Consider that (√n)^3=(√n)(√n)(√n) So we get (√n)(√n)(√n)/n Now consider that (√n)(√n)=n So (√n)(√n)(√n)=(√n)n So we can rewrite the function as (√n)n/n Now consider that n/n=1 Now we get 1(√n) which is just (√n) So we have now proven (√n)^3/n=(√n) for all positive integers. If you have a denominator smaller than the n you will have an increasing output, if it is larger than n you will have an decreasing output. 2 is a positive integer. (√2)^3/2=(√2), (√2)^3/1=2(√2), (√2)^3/3=2(√2)/3 3 also (√3)^3/3=(√3), (√3)^3/2=3(√3)/2, (√3)^3/4=3(√3)/4 His operation is not special, it makes perfect sense, it is logically consistent and has a definable consistent function.
@michaelbonesmusic
did you know if you add 2 + 2 but then divide by 2 it is still 2 - you can do this till the end of your life, just math be math'in
@aikonmishima7945
Man became a human calculator after trying to calculate how much he lost on the Iron Man deals.
@diptarupghosh4431
Not being able to get in tony starks suit got him crazy
@mikhail_roberts
For those who don’t understand … Terrance Howard is missing the fact that “dividing by 2” is the problem when he tries to apply this formula to other numbers. A similar loop can be done with any other number so long as a person divides the by the number that is equal to the starting value, instead of two. The issue Howard missed is that the starting value changes, but the dividing value doesn’t. Somehow, somewhere, someone neglected to explain that to him when he was younger, which has made him fixate on it. A two minute conversation would have solved it.
@SR-bu6kz
The most confusing thing about this video is why is Terrence Howard teaching Maths
@Nightwingx22
From hustle and flow to mathematical shows 😂
@obothehobo173
It makes perfect fucking sense. (√2)³ = √2 * √2 * √2 Since √2 * √2 = 2: (√2)³ = 2 * √2 (2 * √2)/2 = √2 Back where you started. He says thats only the case for 2, but thats only if you divide by 2 at the end. If you divide by the mumber you started with, itll always be a loop, no matter what number you pick. In mathematical terms: [(√x)³]/x = √x. This is true for any x except zero, since dividing by zero is undefined.
@Carib1-j9i
When you ask the local crackhead for directions to walgreens
@nvRDEE
Never open YouTube shorts high at 2:30am again - ✅
@Immortus_Angelo10
Bro was tired of failing his algebra exam and spoke up
@callbettersaul
Let x = √2. Who could've guessed, that x³ divided by x² is x.
@Bunny-co5sz
It does make sense to me. √2 = 2^(0.5) (√2)^3 = 2^(1.5) ((√2)^3)/2 = 2^(0.5) = √2 However, he possesses an impressive memory.
@mineraft3651
It makes complete sense brother, first you take square root of 2 i.e 2^(1/2) then you cube it and it becomes 2^(3/2), now you divide it by 2 so it's 2^(1/2) {coz 3/2 - 1 is 1/2}. and you come back to your square root of 2 where you started, now you can do that with any number just take square root then cube it and divide it by the same number, it's a game of the exponents. Another thing he said if we divide by a bigger number it will grow exponentially, ofc brother coz everytime you do the operations you are increasing it by a factor and the factor is also increasing,duh! And if you take a smaller number you are reducing it at every stage
All the bs can be explained, it's what children do to have fun in school buddy.😩
@zack4527
I’d imagine this is what a senator sounds like during a filibuster
@black_american_nomad
Me explaining why my bank card don't work
@hrodebrt
Bless his heart. Dude lost his mind and now is a professional yapper
@bencarter3920
This is hilarious man, my guy didn’t understand math when he was a kid so he decided to create his own math 😂
@averyang9893