@emilypapillon
I'm always amazed by Quantum Computing ❤
@3Z6ATL
It's not how load or large, its all about how much energy consumption and efficient to say not designing more intricate ways to use facilities that don't require smaller denser components, Is a fault that will never break a cusp of any Quantum SpherQical System
@RamDragon32
I saw a tour of a quantum computing facility years and years ago, and they were processing on a scale so small that lasers were used to stabilise the chip against its own resonant frequencies at the atomic level, and those lasers were liquid nitrogen cooled, and other lasers were used to read the temperature because the interference of the photons (which is insane to think about) could be interpreted to get a reading accuracy read in scientific notation. AND the output was interpreted as a GUESS AT BEST (at least as well as my understanding of quantum superposition theory could interpret what the scientist was really saying. I'm a trekie, give me technobabble that realy does mean nothing.) But it's all of THAT junk that's enormous. And it will never not blow my mind that the technology exists, or the physics gymnastics that have to be performed to do it, or that we can do that at all!
@-tarificpromo-7196
False, it‘s zero point extraction and noise cancellation layered in a gyroscope.
@Hashtagers
Any internships for high school students in QC?
@ajoshdoingthings541
If you got no system stabilisation you've functionally got no computer. So yes, quantum computers are in fact fairly large. No one would go to a data center or even a home PC and say "Your computer isn't actually big, the chip itself is just as big as your thumbnail. It's the case and the fans and the hard drives that make it big" without being commonly considered a) wrong and b) a know-it-all. The chip is just one part of the whole system humans refer to as "computer", your car simply isn't the size of the engine just because it's the engine which makes it go...
@thesugareater8607