@gajoko1746

I am an electrical engineering undergrad student with only a very small knowledge of thermodynamics. This video is very understandable and is a nice introduction into a topic that seems quite complicated. Statistical physics is not a part of my studies but I want to learn more about physics.

@Emmanuel_22

I don't usually comment on youtube videos. However this was by far the most lucid explanation of an abstract concept.  I finally have a vivid understanding of certain things I couldn't comprehend in class. Keep up the good workđź‘Ť.

@BeniBoyzGuitarSlamz

Thanks for these videos. My uni lectures are such a slog, but this was surprisingly enjoyable. Appreciate that you put enthusiasm into your videos and explain things in a very simple and clear manner. Thought I was just a pleb, but these videos have really boosted my confidence.

@declanwk1

Thank you for these videos. It’s ironic that statistical mechanics is not your favourite physics topic but you make it so interesting

@oneluminary

You are really great! Best video I found on Internet. Thankyou so much.

@jcamargo2005

20:00  It seems you mixed the arguments in the formula for the number of combinations with repetitions. This is given by comb(N+U-1, N), which should give 56 microstates.

@TheDrian24

Bro casually dropping the f bomb. I was watching this in library around kids. Great vid still

@topdog5252

6:46 great, because I’ve never heard of that one before. Something could never be both a quark and a gluon, right? A gluon is a boson.

@shamsamir1698

Amazing!
Plzzzz make a playlist this is toooo good not to be continued !

@jsun1993

entropy is not a measure of disorder. it's a measure of how much possible complexity is remaining in a system

@mostafaahmed2789

Thank you but can you put all videos in one playlist soon because I can't find next video and I have near exam

@xenonmob

13:28 wouldn't this be 25 microstates? 28 implies a particle could occupy an energy level 6

@zeferreira8805

14:20 Bars and Stars Method, Numberphile has a great video on this

@Nanba91

Very clear. GREAT way of explanation. thank you very much!!

@danilojrdelacruz5074

Thanks so much for these videos! They're really well explained

@tiffanyk5259

Great teaching! Thank you so much!

@anttibrunstrom1983

@ roughly 14:54, isn't that the formula for combinations? If the particles were non-distinguishable then this would be the case (,right?) but here they are distinguishable. So, should the permutations be calculated using nPr instead of nCr? I'm confused... Could you please elaborate a bit because I can't see where my reasoning fails?

@bukharisquest3837

They shouldering give YouTube a Nobel -Prize for Teaching

@viezegast1305

I'm so deep in i read his name as partition boltzmann

@onlyphysics143

waaao its nice and beutifull confident explanation sir thanks