@socialtrendzandfun758
3 things that changed how I view this whole system: 1) I stopped chasing arguments. 2) I came across Atruve books and the content there hit different. 3) I studied how power really works.
@bchello2266
Thank you Canada!!!! As an American, we love you and wished our leader had the pair yours has. But, to hear the King speak, clearly rebuking T is spectacular!!!!
@FbEye-t1m
From Australia , bravo King Charles 👌🏼 Aussies stand with Canada 🇨🇦
@christinafielder3641
What you've failed to grasp is that Charles was not in Canada in his capacity as the British monarch, but as the Canadian monarch. He is Canada's head of state.
@tomdesjarlais1892
Canadians are taking this seriously.
@deborahbehr3910
So glad our King was well enough to travel to Canada for this occasion.🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁
@rejeangirard2481
I do prefer having a king than a clown!
@royleecordero
Charles is a King. Not a Dictator. A King should have some Dignity about himself. Charles does. Donald has not.
@christineboyce988
Canada is governed by rational adults and wonderful smart citizens who support them. It’s a joy to watch from Wisconsin. Oh 🇨🇦
@hughmann1908
True North, Strong and Free! 🇨🇦
@KouroshJolaei
Canada United 🇨🇦🇦🇺🇳🇿🇬🇧
@Heartadia
Our King, true majesty. Great day to be a Canadian.
@josephsmith594
At this point as a Canadian I’d prefer to go through the pain of standing up to this bully than to roll over. We collectively voted for this approach and are preparing for whatever comes next. Take your best shot.
@marcgauthier3929
It is not the British monarch, it is the Canadian monarch!
@KennethWedin
I’ve noticed that MSNBC and other American news outlets frequently refer to “the British monarchy” or “the British monarch” when reporting on King Charles III, even in the context of his role in Canada. While this phrasing is common in casual conversation, it is technically inaccurate in constitutional terms, particularly for audiences in Canada and other Commonwealth realms. King Charles III is not solely the British monarch—he is also the Canadian monarch, the Australian monarch, the New Zealand monarch, and the head of state of multiple independent countries. In Canada, for example, he reigns in a distinct legal capacity as King of Canada, not as King of the United Kingdom. The institution is properly called the Canadian monarchy, and Charles is the Canadian monarch—our head of state under the Canadian Crown. Referring to Charles as “the British monarch” when discussing his role in Canada perpetuates a colonial mindset and misrepresents the constitutional reality of a shared monarchy across sovereign nations. It is an important distinction that reinforces the independent status of countries like Canada, which maintain their own constitutions, legal systems, and governments, albeit under a common sovereign. Thus, while Charles III is King of the United Kingdom, he is also King of Canada, King of Australia, and so forth—each in a distinct constitutional capacity. Referring to him simply as the British monarch risks conflating these separate roles and unintentionally diminishing the sovereignty of the other realms.
@Jazzygerl
You missed the point. Canada is a Commonwealth Country and those countries and EU with UK have our back. And our Indigenous people are protected by the British Treaties. You don't get it at all.
@mr.v3061
The real king provides stability. The wannabe King downstairs provides chaos.
@kf9346
I'm always proud to be Canadian but even more so after the King's Throne Speech! Brilliant speech, one of a true statesman.
@MeSkeefer
King Charles also said some lovely things about Canada being in his blood and in his heart. His mother loved Canada. This is the King's 20th time visiting Canada. I'm an anti theist, but God save the King! 🇨🇦 🇬🇧
@goodshipkaraboudjan