@FlorianWendelborn
I’d argue JSON and whatever that mess of a JSON implementation in JS are are two different things.
@techwithattila
“What possibly can be so difficult about JSON?” After the video I cried in the corner.
@JamesJansson
I feel like half of this video is inspired by me pointing out why I use null in JS.
@Tresla
This is more about how Javascript handles JSON than JSON itself. Most of these were about how the JSON library handles undefined/null/edge cases that don't exist in other languages, and depend on the library you use. All this to say, I did terribly.
@scheimong
"JavaScript, 💩, an embarrassing toy language used exclusively to build things it's not supposed to."
@AntonioGonzalez-we4wx
The single fact that JSON has his own native class on JavaScript with just two methods should have already told you that something was fishy over there
@ThePrimeagen
Tell me... how many did you ackshually get wrong? DONT LIE
@steveyoo9342
i laughed out loud when you said "don't worry it's not going to get any easier"!
@alexodan
I absolutely loved this video and hated it so much at the same time thanks for this awesome content
@Y0y0Jester
2:52 YouTube hand-picked the exact video that I watched two minutes ago and that led me to watch this video. Are they dumb or do they want me to enter an infinite loop?
@mrk131324
That’s more about the absurdity of JavaScript and it’s JSON module and less about JSON.
@coolworx
The dude has great comedic delivery. The video had me rolling from the getgo.
@tanishqsingla9492
I hate this game that we're playing
@Admir5595
Software development in 2024: watch other devs coding while copilot is responding
@4.0.4
Fun fact the JSON global object with parse and stringify was once a library by the Chuck Norris of Javascript, Doug. Browsers just made it native. At the time, it was a security concern that some devs were just doing eval()!
@HansLemurson
My morale is now undefined.
@beriu3512
Wait a minute BIG SAUCE, that property is private, you little mischief
@IgorGuerrero
Are those behaviors in the spec? Meaning other json parsers should implement them? Sounds more like a JavaScript WAT instead of JSON.
@Terandium
More arguments about JS being horrible than it being about json
@tesla1772