@seklabonline
I truly appreciate your knowledge and the wisdom you share. Thank you.
@johnkinnane547
G’day and thank you for explaining it and your diagrams were easy to follow. Regards John Tasmania Australia 🇦🇺
@robertballantynewilles8506
fantastic explanation🔥🔥 been wondering about this for awhile.
@dubdoodle7191
If you conducted a community workshop about analog tape, I'd sign up. Though I'm ReVox dedicated
@itgrog
this was amazingly helpful, thanks!
@bslaws
0:25 Thought you kind had the Edgar Winter thing going on.
@othmanekaidi8
God bless you sir. Very finely explained. Thank you very much
@chazmechenbier
Loved this explainer. Now I get bias! You mentioned something and then quickly moved off the detail. The gap in the electromagnet -- I will assume that the "charge" is jumping over the gap and being captured by the magnetic compound (rust, ha). Correct?
@Superabound2
Why didn't they premagnitize cassette tape to put all the particles in the same direction in order to prevent tape hiss?
@repairfreak
Cool stuff, nice explanation. Can you maybe explain the Dolby NR system and the even more interesting NR System called DBX that relied upon compression and decompression to mitigate common tape background noise? Thank you
@anonymex22
Well those dictaphone cassette as you call them are the only one produced today, and with correct bias, they sound excellent! Thankfully Type I tape have improved! Bias correct linearity specially in high range so your non linear graph is wrong! This said, shame that we miss at least chromium one, they permit 70ùs eq at this speed!
@muthuvelayuthamvelayutham5159
With an example of the diver's goggle, you explained the funda of Bias very well. Thanks. I have a selection of Tapes which I use to listen in the 70's and 80's, which is nostalgic, and I yearn to revive them. Can you suggest a tape deck strong enough to play the old tapes? Wish you well.
@bogdanpropeck
Cheers mate
@allaudione
Remember HX pro will correct this situation
@SIBIRIAKcom