@beyondmilitary

Following the publication of this video, several viewers rightfully questioned our identification of the missile used by Ukraine’s Magura drone boats to shoot down Russian aircraft. 

To clarify:
On May 4, 2025, Lt. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov, head of Ukraine’s GUR, told The War Zone that “GUR shot down two Su-30 Flanker multirole fighters with AIM-9 Sidewinder infrared-guided air-to-air missiles fired by Magura drone boats.” This official statement expanded the initial claim from one Russian aircraft to two and specifically identified the American-made AIM-9 Sidewinder, not a legacy Soviet model, as the missile used.
This follows a post by the Kyiv Independent that states the two Russian jets were shot down in separate engagements across the Black Sea, and Russian speculation that a legacy Soviet missile was used.
Budanov further stated: “We use a couple of models [of missiles] on our Magura, but the best results [come from] the AIM-9,” indicating that Ukraine still equips its drones with multiple missile types including legacy Soviet missiles like it did during a confirmed shootdown of a Russian helicopter in 2024.
While adapting the Sidewinder, a missile originally designed for aircraft, to a maritime drone is a complex engineering feat, it is technically feasible, especially considering prior adaptations of the AIM-9 for land-based platforms like NASAMS. The successful use of such missiles on a moving sea drone platform would require advanced stabilization, custom fire control software, and rapid integration, but Ukrainian engineers have repeatedly demonstrated remarkable innovation under pressure.

We acknowledge that initial reports were conflicting. Our initial conclusion was based on the best available information at the time and our assumption of known Ukrainian capabilities with the information we had when we made the video. However, as of May 4, 2025, the most credible and direct source, Ukraine’s own military intelligence chief, attributes both victories to the AIM-9 Sidewinder.

Below are some of the sources we relied upon for our initial research:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-says-it-shot-down-russian-fighter-jet-sea-drone-first-time-2025-05-03/
https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-intelligence-says-sea-drone-downs-russian-fighter-jet-in-world-first-strike/
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/51994

@robertc5292

Anybody else kinda sad the drone didn't make it home to his drone buddies?

@Robboa1

I wonder if parking another drone along the return route, to intercept a helicopter would cause them to think twice about chasing the first drone. The helicopter is flying low and slow, and would be a sitting duck.

@vitaliolijnik2799

The Magura 7 sea drone which shot down the Su-30M over the Black Sea was equipped with a Sidewinder air-to-air missile and not a manpad launcher, as the video maintains. This has been confirmed by the Ukrainian military intelligence chief, Budanov.

@184Kitkat

No, the Russian pilots do NOT get a warning that they are locked since IR seekers are passive. This is also why we see no evasive actions from the aircraft. They didnt see it coming.

@SeñorSeedling

Ukrainians have shown a consistent ability to adapt and improve any asset and leverage it to full it to full effect.

@paulhusby8344

Give credit where it's due, this was very good storytelling.  Well done!

@Kreistor

Mistake at 5:25. MANPADS are passive IR seekers, and thus very hard to detect. You are treating the SU-27 like it was targeted by a radar homing missile. He would have died with no knowledge he was being attacked.
Below, someone pointed out that a Sidewinder was used: that's active radar homing, but he would have used flack, not flares. Flares don't fool radar and flack doesn't fool IR.

@binhquang9802

This video makes it clear that modern warfare is evolving faster than I can keep up. Seeing a drone take down a Su27 with such precision and stealth is both impressive and a little terrifying. What’s next—robots fighting our battles?

@chrisgraham2904

I assume this is a staggering win for Ukraine considering the cost value of the sea drone compared to the Russian fighter jet.

@marksmith9176

If they could make it submersible to 3 meters would be a game changer.

@dmarkieb

The graphic of the MANPAD is backwards, the rocket is shown shooting the rocket is shooting out of the rear of the launch tube. Also a stinger would elevate to be a few degrees above the intended target.

@commonsense31

Ukraine are seriously become the best drone manufacturers in the world.

@TimArsenault

This drone has been developed with some nice offensive features. What if they added a duck and cover defensive mode where it could stop and semi-submerge. It might not be cost-effective, but it would be an interesting addition.

@williamgrissom1995

Like trading a pawn for a bishop in chess. A great trade off financially.

@panzervpl9406

I feel like submersible drones would have better survivability but this one was definitely worth it

@Intotheout.

whoever did this video here did a phenomenal job. very intriguing, and informative.. impressive what these men are capable of doing with technology, but how evil it has become. Very well done.

@josephshultz6726

Congrats to the admirable Ukraine forces.  Can this be accomplished on a larger scale?

@Katnea3

Great video guys! Thank you!
🌻💙💛🌻

@gino3286

it seems that non stealthy jets are becoming obsolete fast    too vulnerable