@pintuhalder6151
Yes I wanna see the Schrodinger's process
@Dr_LK
Yes, show us the original derivation. Thanks.
@patb3845
This is really good. Spent months pondering many derivations of SE. This looks the best. Will read that paper with interest.
@jesusmoralestrejo1756
Yes, it would be incredible to see how Schrödinguer derived it. It doesn't matter if the video is 1 hour long👀
@mathunt1130
You missed out the potential term in the explanation. Schrodinger also "derived" a hyperbolic version of the equation but dropped it as it didn't predict good results of something which is why he dropped it. I'd be interested in seeing a video on that.
@ForanoDeBergemarc
Thanks for this simpler intro. And Yes Yes Yes to Schrödinger's one Pleaaaaase :) Simply drooling over your own usual incredibly talented coverage of complex matters into layman terms.
@matrix8163
Yes! I want to see Schrödinger's way of approaching his equation.
@ewfewff
Tak!
@petergreen5337
Beautiful derivation. ❤thank you very much.
@bjornfeuerbacher5514
5:30 Another reason for not taking the square root is that momentum is actually a vector, so if you want to take the square root, you have to write the length of the vector p instead of only p. When using the squared form, it's enough to simply write the square of the vector p, no absolute value needed.
@cirdiam1800
Another great video from you that has made it to the top of my favourites list. Yes please do the other derivation too.
@jakeadams2562
Brilliant content. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us 🙌
@alihan_s_berk
Please also make a video about Schrödinger's derivation Also I love your videos, don't stop making them
@satechknowledge2303
Please make a separate video how Schrodinger derived his equation
@enricolucarelli816
How come you get plank constant on both sides of the equation? Could we not simplify removing one h on both sides? Actually I’m used to see momentum squared where it says h squared.
@carlosg.anguiano9584
Would be fantastic to see a video with Schrödingers specific derivation. Amazing content as always!
@FrancisFjordCupola
Of course, we'd love to see the separate video. This may just help make the other graspable, but even so... :P
@jamesblank2024
I'm very impressed with this video. Simple logical steps that get us to Klein-Gordon. Details worked out by the student.
@walterbushell7029
Do thisr equation work for relativistic particles? I would suppose not at least with this derivation.
@iamharsh23