@EvanWasHere
When you have to remove the authors of a report and refuse to show who has peer reviewed the report, then the report is not legitimate. No other report gets released like this.
@Zizou_77
So much for being “the most transparent (administration) regime in history.”
@istan21
No authors = just a post on 4Chan
@beevebeeverson
Bets that the report was compiled and reviewed by AI?
@mariusg8824
Ah, yes, that's a totally legit procedure that absolutely doesn't look fishy in any way. Who wrote it? Won't say. Who made the research? Won't say. Who reviewed it? Won't say. Can I review it? Absolutely not!
@dianedavidson5283
Lol! Withholding names is the opposite of maintaining integrity.
@kirstenmelum1104
Imagine thinking this much about less than 1% of the population.
@rachelcastro1959
I wouldn't believe a word this report says.
@Epoch11
What an absolute joke
@user-wd7sm2wz7z
So when are they going to focus on lower taxes and a better economy instead of less than 1% of the population?
@JudithChrismon
This administration is dangerous for America 😢
@ShroomNana
Transparency is integrity
@JasonFord-l3p
Scandalous
@hollimurray9367
This report highlights how Sweden and Finland have stronger laws to protect children than we do.
@RyRaps-Get-It
Aww shucks… how are we supposed to award these “brilliant scientists” the Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine if they didn’t sign their Magnum Opus?? 🙄🙄🙄
@trentlytle7289
Peer reviewed by Prager University?
@Apoetess6969
Any data analyst worth their salt would laugh at this “report” as the science and data is flawed and the fact that they do not list peer reviews says it all!
@jeansavage206
How can a report with anonymous authors and peer reviewers be considered as anything other than bogus.
@skittslol1407