@KostadinIvanov-ik9qs
:finger-red-number-one:
@deleteriouslaplacedemon
5:19 Dan Harlow and Lenny susskind. Two important figures in Blackhole Information paradox when someone said Information is lost in black holes 😂
@LaboriousCretin
6:08 You also get degeneracy pressures in black holes. Quantum boundaries from the degeneracy pressure layers. Plankian a limit. Planckian can exist below the Schwartzchild. CMB differences to the maximum planck temperature shows how far below and temperature needed and mixed state and such. 10:54 How to blow up a black hole 12.5 light years in diameter with error bars. 12:40 EPR is basically one black hole moving in space. If you look at it with different perspective. 14:19 What goes in doesn't come out the same, and censorship. The last minutes of a black hole evaporating. As hawking radiation ramps up until it hits the last planck. The last bit being destroyed by light. Censorship layrrs and at the end also. 18:32 Schwartzchild and turning the cone into a donut in pinched off space and the curvature of space around and pressures reacting with it. A older island theory revisited. But just one version also. 21:13 What about gravity and magnetic fields? Fermi bubbles. 24:57 slightly deceptive. The preparation is half/half or up and down entanglement that represents a waveform. So saying the same as classical preparation is off when all are prepared the same. You could have done better as you got the other parts of the basics of the concept trying to convey. 32:29 You say looking at one changes ghe other rather than looking at one tells the corelation to the other when looked at. If one is up the othrr is down. 34:36 energy dinsity and thresholds for particle production and constraints on quantum foam. A few kicker questions for evaporation and ramping up. 36:44 decoherance simple. Disturbance and time distortion beyond a point. Decoherance. 38:13 gets distributed out through the system in ways. 40:08 not lost but transformed. 41:16 Weird when you already have it in places. 41:54 It's part of Einstein equations in a way even. 42:45 try a couple variants and just which one is right or more correct or such judgements. 44:22 It's a very small contribution to quantum foam landscape. Probability and predictability and particle production from quantum foam and gravitational waves and energy density regimes. Crazy small contribution. 47:22 No FTL as much as mass imprinting and magnetic fields spun up. 48:33 cherenkov radiation. Schwartzchild radius and maximum planck temperature. 50:53 Yep crazy and where it comes out/forms at, even crazier. Yet possible. 53:18 Easier to create a copy than try to retrieve and reassemble the original. 54:08 They get shredded and burned and changed. Not the same as when entering. The new particles may not even be able to make the original. Thank you for sharing the video and lecture. Keep up the good work. Look for a possible fluidic neutrino state and unique superfluid in the black holes.
@tinyear926
Modeling information as a static quantum property (wavefunction state), and assuming that unitarity or scrambling solves causality — without modeling what a field is, or how memory is preserved or transformed. Is a category error.
@DROMNI-lc2vo
I think it was Dr feynman who commented if you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand it.
@azharalibhutto1209
Great 👍👍👍
@abhisheksingh1143
Where is QnA?
@DROMNI-lc2vo
It would be nice if you flat out stated which version of quantum mechanics you felt was correct. For example in this case you follow the Copenhagen rules.
@center__mass
To be fair , she talked in circles
@tonibat59
Started exciting, then got promising, ended up in a whimper.😢
@The-Pullet-and-Duck
That Toronto joke isn't going down very well! anyway, nice quantom coin analogy, however, what has it got to do with a black hole? Here's the thing: If a partical pair appear just outside a blackhole event horizon... okay, there's a load of quantom numbers associated with the particals, but the positive or nevitive charge, or the colour, or the spin averages out over the surface of the blackhole, and one partical, with essentially, half the energy and mass of the partical pair escapes the blackhole and the other, with half the energy and mass of the partical pair, falls into the blackhole (with the same spin, charge, mass, energy that has escaped).... how has the blackhole lost any mass or energy? Whatever mass, energy or quantom number has escaped, the same masse-energy-averaging-to-0 quantom numbers have escaped! The other thing is: Who has carried out any experiment on a black hole? How can you proove any of this theory? When do you expect puny humans to fiddle about inches from the Event Horizon? This is all theoretical bollocks and real scientists should be ashamed of tantalising the general public with what is no more than, superstitious claptrap.
@ispeeeaaakeeewhaaaleee
Blackhole Sun
@WingZeroDuality
👍🌌👍
@krishnanramakrishnan472
It's just DHARMA the core meaning
@merlepatterson