@Number_Cruncher
I watched it from the start to the end and enjoyed every second. Very well motivated, nice historical embedding. I have the feeling that I learned a lot about graphs and hyper-graphs.
@michael169chapman
Beautiful video. Thank you
@Jnath33
Wow, what's a video, this video for me show all the beauty of mathematics. Using some subject which seems quite remote at first sight. When you end your explaination about turan conjecture I try pose the video and trying to find the link this didn't take long because the only posible connection was tetraedron free hypergraph. (obvious as you did half the video on it). But finding this connection make me vibrate because this show all the beauty of math (for my perspective). So thank you for you video.
@jakeaustria5445
Thank You
@saikat93ify
Amazing video and video quality
@joshuazelinsky5213
Hmm, interesting that the explicit calculation of Turan numbers is only up to 14, and way back in 1993, since we have a lot more computer power now. Do you know if anyone has tried to push beyond T(14) since then? Edit: OEIS lists sequence A140462 which is just the upper bound from Turan's method but does not apparently have a separate entry for T(n).
@dylanmenzies3973
So what is the best bound, is it known for n = 100? Do we know that any map from point triples to acuteness can be realised in a configuration?
@ThatHippyPerson
What else can it be beside 519
@Fematika