@nbt3663
Prosecution or should I say persecution has no evidence. They have a story and no evidence to back their story. Their "a story" is clearly not "the story."
@ISEEKSPACE
To everyone who thinks she is guilty and hit him with her car, why would the police botch the investigation? Wouldn't it have been easier to investigate this properly and let justice take its course? Why would they keep evidence for months, why wouldn't they keep logs properly? Why wouldn't they have videotaped the interrogations? Why destroy the entire case if they knew she did it? It makes absolutely no sense. She is innocent. All the experts agreed that there was no collision. There was no proof he was hit. Even if she think she did, it's up to be the investigation to prove it and they didn't.
@sarahboyles8067
It's so obvious that she is not guilty
@jeremyt8955
They got rid of their family dog, it was never seen again after all this went down……how do you explain that?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They got rid of the their family dog because they knew the bite marks could have been matched to the their poor dog. They are sooooo guilty!
@Mrs.AD0099
How can John's family still think he was hit by a car? Its bizarre
@Methmar
There is no prove he was hit by a car. Period
@nbt3663
If the red is lit, you must acquit.
@murderwiththecourt7834
Not guilty.
@I_AM_BAYTOR
Prosecution is just grasping at straws.
@heatherleighstage
Insanity. You don't investigate the yard or inside of the house? No Collision. Acquit.
@dideedi7351
This woman should be acquitted, period, full stop.
@jeremyt8955
Did anyone here bother to listen to the defense’s closing statement? Based on the text messages of the officers alone!!!!! You know this is a cover up!!!!
@jeremyt8955
The iPhone data proved he was in a warm area for hours after he died. The snow plower guy proved there wasn’t a dead body there when he was supposedly hit. There’s a dead guy on your front lawn that you had been hanging out with all night and you don’t come out of your house?!!
@eternity2993
She's not guilty!!!!! I find it funny when the prosecutor shows Brian greeting John and, after a few seconds, saying, "Please take that out of my head." I wonder if they don't want to see what the defense attorney showed, where it's clear how he was challenged. On the other hand, knowing what happened in Brian's yard—Brian's nephew already had an altercation in John's yard—they don't say anything about it. All that matters is setting a cruel trap for Karen, and the friend who called Karen to look for John is talking badly about her. You don't need enemies to have friends like that. I hope Karen is innocent and the others are in jail, since they are such good friends.
@pam6455
The prosecution does a great job of looking at things. I actually think we now have no idea what has happened. The defence has proved absolute not guilty.
@catherinearmstrong388
Loads of reasonable doubt. How did they take it to trial with a straight face?
@mercedeswestbrook4356
I can't even listen to the prosecution... that donkey bray of a voice and the paper-thin lies... just revolting to see corruption on such display! A sad day/month/years for Boston Police reputation.
@rtbakes1
The only reason I wish Karen had taken the stand is to get the conversations in the car that nobody knows. Maybe he knew he was headed for a fight. Maybe he knew he could take Higgins. He walked into an ambush. My opinion. Set up at the waterfall
@suzirenaud5956
Reed initiated the first text with Brian Higgins.
@nbt3663