@Pedri2025-y1k
People who produce these shallow analysis videos will disappear way before software engineers 😂
@dreamworm8
People still can't understand difference between programming and software engineering
@BangMaster96
AI Programming only works if an actual Programmer is giving commands to the AI to write the Program. If your average Joe Schmoe without Computer Science understanding is asked to write programming solutions with AI, they're gonna fail miserably because they can't validate or check or test the code generated by the AI, nor can they implement the solution in an already existing codebase. You still need Software Engineers who understand the fundamentals, the coding language and the tools to be able to write AI scripts to create code and put that code into an actual working and existing codebase. Companies that fire all Software Engineers will suffer miserably with their Web or Mobile Application, because it still requires actual Software Engineers who understand the product, who understand the software architecture, who understand the code base, and who can respond to critical bugs and errors on a dime to keep that Web or Mobile App up and running. If AI comes to a point where it no longer requires Software Engineers to give it commands, and it can handle the entire front end, back end, continuous integration, continuous delivery, real time bugs and error handling, reliability, scalability, adding new features, improving existing features, deprecating old features, unit testing, managing sprints and tickets, writing documentation, and come up with new ideas and solutions, then sure, all Software Engineers will be out of a Job, but until that point, the World is still going to need actual Human Software Engineers.
@captaingabi
I am a SE and Architect. I am 100% sure I will have a job till I am retired.
@pinto7685
Non IT people can´t even fix the printer, and the video is telling me they will start building applications using AI only...
@anasnagati5079
they confused Copilot with Github copilot 🤣
@furycorp
Software engineering alive and well. Kids spending two weeks on a udemy course or attending a bootcamp and calling themselves engineers, something that started in America and was later embraced by the industry, are toast.
@peterlk3276
Engineers will only be replaced if AI reaches a level of human-like intelligence, context, and awareness. At that point, the concern won’t be about careers in software — it’ll be an existential shift where far greater issues will take priority.
@gushock5487
Taking serious videos like this is like readying gossip magazines and then asking to be called a scientist.
@bjorntrollowsky4279
I have a feeling this will age like milk :D But on a more serious note some people didn't notice the current bad economy combined with the covid-time insane hiring sprees resulted in the recent large layoffs, and combine this with the current AI hype and they get the idea that software development is dead.
@AdityaGupta1998
I rarely bother commenting on videos, but as a Senior Software Engineer, I felt compelled to speak up. This video is an unfortunate example of how misleading and misinformed content can gain traction. The sheer volume of inaccuracies, coupled with the shallow understanding of both programming and computer science, is frankly astonishing. It feels like this was produced by someone with a philosophical background rather than any real technical expertise. What’s particularly troubling is how confidently these half-truths and misconceptions are presented, creating a dangerous illusion of authority. The immature framing, superficial analysis, and blatant disregard for nuance make this video not only misleading but actively harmful, especially for non-technical viewers who might take it at face value. I’m confident that professionals with actual experience and skill will have secure careers for decades to come. I can’t say the same for content creators who produce material like this. Ironically, the very AI they sensationalize could replace them more efficiently than it ever could real engineers even at this very moment.
@helloumeis
There's a common belief that AI can replace developers and that anyone, even without technical knowledge, can get complex tasks done by just 'asking the AI.' To test that, I gave the AI full context on hooking, reverse engineering, and Rust. I described a specific use case involving hooking an address in a struct, where the field was a pointer to a pointer referencing another struct without padding. Despite all that, the AI repeatedly failed. So now I'm wondering: how is someone without technical background supposed to explain this better than I did?
@dannypasquel1923
Lets be honest. This is cooked. Network, build brand, long life learning, soft skills, hard skills, learn, portofolio, github projects, personal site .... I do not have 6 lifes.
@dasaauploads1143
RIP to all unemployed people who watched to tech influencers
@TomasVasquez
minute 0:49 they changed from Software Engineers to Tech Workers, two completely different roles. Did not need to watch the rest honestly.
@hethosdeus3504
As a SWE, I’m not worried. I tried using Claude 3.7 to improve some simple Bash scripts I use for various repo and OS level management. It injected so many errors I had to stop using it and just do it manually. LLMs struggle with existing code bases. That hasn’t changed despite larger context windows. What you have here is a bunch of CEOs trying to improve their bottom line for investors that will ultimately backfire, and these companies will just end up hiring engineers anyway to fix it all of the LLM mistakes.
@kiaranr
I'm a software engineer who has recently started using AI at home on personal projects because I'm not allowed to use it at work. In my personal experience, it can be an incredible accelerator. But for anything more complicated than a basic CRUD web-app, you still need a human driver who understands the code. If you don't it will screw things up spectacularly and end in a miserable state. But if you know exactly what you want and can describe it in clear unambiguous language, it will greatly boost your productivity. Just don't expect it to architect your solution.
@xmauber
AI needs commands, commands need requirements well defined When AI be able to understand blurry requirements stated in a fuzzy way by clueless stakeholders….that will be an achievement
@DanielOlaya12
I am a software engineer at a Fortune 100 and I’m pursuing a master’s in Computer Science with an AI specialization. I use AI at work, and honestly, AI at most helps me create simple unit tests. It might help me 10-20% of the time. Anything that is complex is useless. It doesn’t check logs, it doesn’t know how systems interact with each other in a large infrastructure corporate system. These large language models will plateau eventually. They will not exponentially grow forever. If you check the AI development history, it is full of breakthroughs followed by decades of roadblocks. When the large language models plateau, it will hit another roadblock until the next advancement in AI. Anyway, just don’t get into CS 😂 less competition for us 😁
@hdimessi