@heowbert

This is really social and technical archeology. I really love how you put this into context of the mid 80s. People really have to remember how limited computers of the time were, it could deal with numbers bigger than 255, amazing! I'd really like to run this on emulation, I could program without strings but it would be hard without LET, however you do have MAPC

@PixelOutlaw

One similar dialect you might try is MicroLISP for Commodore 64. With some digging you may find a disk image of it to load into an emulator.
One of the first things that struck me was lack of strings, instead you use multi word symbols which are allowed with functions like EXPLODE and IMPLODE to work with them.
It's not so bad once you get used to it.
However, not being able to do decimal math does actually make BASIC of the era feel more powerful. That said Lisp has the clear advantage for code organization as you've got functions so you can have clean separation of program pieces unlike Commodore BASIC.

@alexanderalejandre241

Thank you for these videos. Your enthusiasm is clear and pleasant to hear. These windows in the past, into a future we lost are very interesting!

@xaxfixho

Interesting video format 🤔