@nickgrant5142

These lenses are hella expensive but ultra crispy

@JP_STARR

Can't wait to buy one in 10 years time

@yuripimentailustração

A 35-85mm f/2 would be pretty interesting too.

@ishankumar4471

so it’s perfect for portraits

@onuegbuemmanuel5176

The image quality of this video is 📸 🔥

@jablodoes

sony watchin this video like tyrese: “what more do you want from meeeeeheeeeheheheeeee”

@brickboyslim

Outrageously priced

@LuxeImageCompany

That looks like a beauty

@SoJesusChristMusic

Wow! I was just saying this to myself yesterday! Only problem is I have Canon 😒

@noobahata

As a product Photographer Im always switching between my 24-70 and my 90 this could be a great product lens!

@sbrensbeve2388

This is deff gonna be a cinema lens, everything is optically corrected, there's no focus breating and internal zoom

@elmarketingdemarian

the song is awesome

@ProDrummer

Why not 16 - 1600, f/0.95 ?

@nightdonutstudio

If this is the second f2, then I feel Sony should make first one 20/24-50 f2 instead of 28-70 f2.

@jeroenvdw

So its a great lens but what people forget it that F1.8 lets in 33% more light, F1.4 lets in 100% more light and F1.2 133% more light. So yeah it won't really beat a fast prime lens

@AhmedRaza-ii5fo

Sony always drops crazy stuff duu❤

@Riles07

$6200 lens up here in Canada. So thats like...$100 US? Good value!

@JonGarcia1990

I have the 70-200 GM II and OSS isn’t really that big of a deal in most cases. Not going to upgrade for the extra stop BUT i will say it’s an equal trade off. You just have to pay up a little to LOSE 50mm of reach. (Reach often times far more valuable in many situations I’ve come across)
If you’re primarily a portrait shooter though, I think this is the way to go.

@LifesShutterMoments

18mm-250mm f/2.0 would be dope

@mayankchawla2757

The temptation to get this lens 🤌🏻